Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.57% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181015
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105 8,721 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 28 1-Core 57.1 2-Core 97.6 33% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 165 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 61.7 53% 63.5 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 62.5 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1029A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 69 4 56 1.3 3.1 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.57% Terrible	Read 143 Write 151 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 22.8 18% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 2% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 324GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 102 100 71 109 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 28 Write 121 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 102 51% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB 3,584 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	27x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	23x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 6,575 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $32

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16