Toshiba Satellite L855

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite L855 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '17 at 08:32
Run Duration	355 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 167 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 422 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 5.34 5% 6.14 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 5.74 5% 5.64 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 242 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 10 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 55 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 439309174	96.5% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 413 Mixed 201 83% 375 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 37.8 132% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 99.9 109% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 124%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 31GB free Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -94489275451 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1064 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 201 (B7) Unknown 100 100 9 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 32 55 55838179360 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 201 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 296088 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 49 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 84 84 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 296088 (F2) Unknown 100 100 290083 (F9) Unknown 100 100 62049	48.1% Average	Read 264 Write 132 Mixed 161 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 17.2 79% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 36.1 53% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A2 3TB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 495GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 24.3 Mixed 26.8 34% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.25 62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 76GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 26.2 Mixed 28.7 37% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.17 52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 44%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 8GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 6.05 Mixed 10.4 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.92 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.33 32% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-072.A00G 99U5428-063.A00LF 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.1 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L855 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	73x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	43x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	104x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	83x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	10x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16