Packard EasyNote TE69KB

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TE69KB (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TE69KB
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 00:34
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,900 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 49.5 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 48.5 28% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 47.5 8-Core 47.9 7% 47.7 Pts	64-Core 47.8 3% 47.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,289 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 076F) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.3000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.8 1% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.3 1% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 175,511 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 244 244 231 260 258 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 420 Write 380 Mixed 340 SusWrite 260 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 29.2 95% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 99.3 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 90.7 70% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSK64W6N Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GB 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TE69KB Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE69KB

CPU
E1-2500 APUAMDBench 21%, 2,900 samples	86x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 29%, 8,046 samples	34x
E2-3800 APUAMDBench 27%, 1,024 samples	21x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,289 samples	86x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 1%, 6,887 samples	34x
HD 8280AMDBench 1%, 1,472 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 64%, 255,054 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 95%, 175,511 samples	3x
M500 240GBCrucial $70Bench 75%, 25,869 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 24%, 10,736 samples	17x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 2,461 samples	17x
ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 1,065 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $32

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $320	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16