Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory11.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 126
58% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 277
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 119
Parallax 113
96% 117 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.4
91% 114 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 82 94 45 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 203
Write 199
Mixed 196
SusWrite 81.7
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 15.3
50% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 140
116% 166 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
445GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 103 99 109 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 126
SusWrite 98.7
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 20.9
68% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 115
83% 106 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 134 128 141 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 128
Mixed 70
SusWrite 129
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
544GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 146 139 161 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 98.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 140
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
446% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 101 97 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 57.3
Write 102
Mixed 54
SusWrite 95.9
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $426
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback