MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120402
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 18:20
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 110
53% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 229
25% 197 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.1% Poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 19.5
18% 14.3 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 24.7
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 345 347 348 349 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 342
Write 350
Mixed 252
SusWrite 343
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 30.9
125% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 318
244% 331 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 106%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
27GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 223 233 234 234 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.6% Good
Read 243
Write 236
Mixed 194
SusWrite 226
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 30.8
112% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 194
146% 193 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
272GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 123 123 124 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 178
Write 151
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 123
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
144GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 99.2
Write 99.4
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 61.8
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB-$45
136GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 53.8
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 54.5
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
164% 2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1609U2 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8001 AE34G1609U2 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback