Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190318
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 828
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 111
Parallax 114
100% 116 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 105
Splatting 94.9
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 77 96 85 88 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 394
Write 135
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 89.1
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 16.9
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 27.8
57% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
61GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 128 113 112 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 114
Write 75.1
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 114
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
92GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 51 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 84.8
Write 82.8
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 51.5
87% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 133 135 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 105
SusWrite 134
175% 130 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
312% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Trek 123GB
87GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 18 18 13 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 17.7
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.6
133% 3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 26.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,080
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback