Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 77 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 105 49% 78.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 294 32% 251 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Lighting 63.2 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 84.4 52% 69.5 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 45.4 46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 89 89 84 88 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.2% Average	Read 181 Write 146 Mixed 153 SusWrite 83.5 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 30 105% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 36.4 32% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 510GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 90 89 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 81.2 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 87.6 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 645GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 80 80 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 68.2 Write 71.6 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 78.9 52% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.2% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 10.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88T-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88T-V EVO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	10x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	10x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	4x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	3x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	11x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16