PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H370M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190507 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 17 '21 at 16:07 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 289 291 295 294 293 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$75
112GB free
Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 460 461 467 426 299 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 190 200 207 211 296 MB/s
|
59.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
465GB free
Firmware: AP25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 130 132 131 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 197 199 200 200 200 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 72x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 64x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 55x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 29x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $190 |