Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SB  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 13:38
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 225
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 492
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8520) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.5% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 52.4
Parallax 37.3
39% 45.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 50.1
32% 37.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 812 790 761 824 801 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1678
Write 1,328
Mixed 907
SusWrite 831
265% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.9
244% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 713
528% 701 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 225%
Great: 355%
SX8200PNP-512GT-S 512GB
348GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 981 993 498 351 740 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,336
Write 1506
Mixed 133
SusWrite 679
255% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 71.7
230% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 478
377% 524 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 231%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 5 SB Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback