Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 01:03
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
87% 151 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 685
72% 565 Pts
64-Core 834
56% 834 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 32.1
26% 31.7 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 20.7
28% 30.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$145
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2019 1993 1913 1204 622 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,135
Write 1,680
Mixed 868
SusWrite 1,392
287% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 67.2
195% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 924
702% 953 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 235%
Great: 396%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
470GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 116 115 117 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70% Good
Read 130
Write 101
Mixed 29
SusWrite 114
68% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 28.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 4,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback