Lenovo 255321G

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 255321G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 23:59
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 188 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 457 52% 407 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341A) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.02 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.7% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 65.5 34% 56 fps	MRender 59.6 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 43.8 41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 204 178 138 110 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 450 Write 418 Mixed 325 SusWrite 188 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 3 56% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 138 133% 213 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 305GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 61 62 57 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 49.8 Write 41.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 57.9 32% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 125GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 56 56 53 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 61.6 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 52.3 46% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 255321G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 255321G

CPU
Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $107Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x
SSD Plus 480GBSanDisk $40Bench 53%, 16,752 samples	1x
1TB 1TBWalramBench 153%, 664 samples	1x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16