Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150526
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 211 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 652 63% 519 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.3% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 75.3 50% 64.6 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 41.9 42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 228 224 233 232 232 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.1% Very good	Read 245 Write 232 Mixed 232 SusWrite 230 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 37.2 127% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 129%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 298GB free Firmware: PB3OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 76.3 Write 76.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 75.6 49% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	74x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	69x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16