Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2603 0 224 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 46 2-Core 86.8 42% 65.5 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 185 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 19.6 12% 17.6 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 63 56 68 75 72 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 240 Write 200 Mixed 79 SusWrite 75.4 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 11.1 40% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 54.7 DQ Write 23.2 DQ Mixed 27.1 23% 35 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 55%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 233GB free Firmware: 3E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 89 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 81.5 Write 80.9 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 88.1 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9 Samsung M378B1G73QH0- RMR1881ED58E9 Samsung M378B1G73QH0- 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.1% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16