Lenovo 3246B9F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3246B9F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 860-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 93.1
49% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 286
29% 229 Pts
64-Core 296
20% 296 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 42.6
38% 45.8 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 38.1
34% 39.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 142
Write 104
Mixed 92.7
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 17.6
72% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 166
121% 159 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback