Emachines eME732Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Emachines eME732Z (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines HM55_CP
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110214
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 10:59
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium P6200 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Memory 22.1 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 65.1 23% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 70.1 8-Core 55.9 9% 63 Pts	64-Core 63.6 4% 63.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0498) 763MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.2 0% 0.9 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 13 19 28 36 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 24.9 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 25.6 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23.6 Write 11.5 Mixed 17 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 89% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.5 GB/s	Latency 305 13% 305 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical eME732Z Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines eME732Z

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	7x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	7x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
X25-M 120GBIntelBench 36%, 1,606 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 1,212 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16