Toshiba Satellite C55-A

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 06:59
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 121 57% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 174 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 2.7 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 311 354 353 357 355 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 435 Write 446 Mixed 402 SusWrite 343 92% 406 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 34.5 113% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 266 213% 302 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 128%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125 23,438 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 368GB free Firmware: JA2OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 79 92 91 90 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 76.2 Mixed 32 SusWrite 88.8 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 6GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-A Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-A

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	87x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	51x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	41x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	123x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	91x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	16x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	12x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16