Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180424 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '21 at 02:13 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
54% 86.9 Pts
|
53% 439 Pts
|
54% 876 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.7%
Excellent
|
84% 113 fps
|
81% 99.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS340 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 113 66 31 78 45 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
42% 186 MB/s
|
79% 26.5 MB/s
|
48% 96.4 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
27GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 227 224 223 224 224 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
46% 203 MB/s
|
63% 21.5 MB/s
|
94% 147 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
405GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 119 120 118 MB/s
|
66.6%
Good
|
76% 104 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.7%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 445 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 109x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 48x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 44x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 36x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $130 |