Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 01:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$152
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 837
84% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 61.6
53% 64.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 62.9
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 210 242 240 221 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 460
Write 301
Mixed 240
SusWrite 233
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 25.4
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 136
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
585GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 154 158 160 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 119
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 156
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 114%
MB2000EAZNL 2TB
755GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 133 135 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 148
Write 138
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 134
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
224% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback