Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 51
2-Core 103
51% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 192
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 88.8
48% 69 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 44
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 118 130 99 115 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 443
Write 390
Mixed 322
SusWrite 141
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 25.8
85% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 131
109% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
105GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 75.8
Write 74.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 68
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 134 131 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 160
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 134
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
11GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 67 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 63
Write 62.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 66.6
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback