HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 87C3
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201102
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 23:50
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Memory 82.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 588 8-Core 950 94% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,429 88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.8% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 94.1 Parallax 109 92% 105 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 107 Splatting 86.6 87% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,189 Write 1,234 Mixed 1,008 256% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 72.2 256% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 855 DQ Write 915 DQ Mixed 730 592% 833 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: HPH5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 194 195 193 190 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 142 Write 60.8 Mixed 73 SusWrite 192 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 112%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 11TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 196 207 205 206 208 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 210 Mixed 201 SusWrite 205 282% 205 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 1.7 404% 7.17 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 8.6 DQ Mixed 1.8 357% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 32.8 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 34.5 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,571x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	1,299x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	746x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,695x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	803x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	571x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	919x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples	803x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	553x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 1,949 samples	843x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 3,401 samples	600x
HP32D4U8D8HC-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 1,304 samples	497x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16