Asus Commando

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081222
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5450-$210
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 109
47% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
EVGA(3842 1150) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 4.1
8% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 4.3
7% 7.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$32
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 205 31 45 55 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 258
Write 229
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 95.9
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1
29% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 47
69% 128 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
668GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 51.2
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 69.4
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 42%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
221GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 69.5
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 67.4
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
118% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
12GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.3 5.4 5.9 4.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 26
Write 18.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 6.1
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
80% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback