Asus N90SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N90SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUS N90SC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100121
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 49.3
1-Core 30
2-Core 57.1
30% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 60.1
8-Core 59.3
8% 59.7 Pts
64-Core 59.1
4% 59.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M
Asus(1043 203B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 90 89 88 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 106
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 83.5
18% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 24.2
74% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 33.7
28% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
278GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 70 77 77 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 76.6
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
259GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 22
Write 18.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 12.6
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
142GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 17.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 12.3
23% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N90SC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus N90SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback