Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080229
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 13:52
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462 772 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 80.3 41% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 319 28% 240 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 00A6) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.57% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 5.9 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.57% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 219 Write 217 Mixed 206 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 20.7 94% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30 DQ Write 85.4 DQ Mixed 24.4 28% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 931GB free Firmware: GK0BA96A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,742 Write 26 Mixed 50.2 435% 606 MB/s	4K Read 243 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.9 10,589% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 473GB free Firmware: GK0BA96A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,736 Write 21.3 Mixed 42 430% 600 MB/s	4K Read 235 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 3.5 10,190% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 160GB-$117 432 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: YAR511W0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,793 Write 24.4 Mixed 47.3 446% 622 MB/s	4K Read 242 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.7 10,550% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 33%
Linux File-CD Gadget 32GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 23GB free, PID 1037 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 20.2 Write 20 Mixed 23.2 28% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 4.9 431% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24% Poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 10.6 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples	98x
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	22x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	11x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	28x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	25x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16