| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Default string (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Colorful DJ C.A320M-K PRO |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 15 '21 at 01:10 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
79% 142 Pts
|
72% 582 Pts
|
57% 919 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.3%
Below average
|
43% 50.2 fps
|
21% 29.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 41 47 30 38 31 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
34% 153 MB/s
|
70% 26.9 MB/s
|
57% 109 MB/s
|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
195GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 468 469 461 451 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
67% 295 MB/s
|
110% 40 MB/s
|
171% 250 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
48.8%
Average
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
47% 84.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,509 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Default string
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,018x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 956x |
| Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 906x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 486x |
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 458x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |