Intel X79M-S

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	60 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 21:56
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 444 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.5% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 71.6 42% 60.7 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 44.2 42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 458 357 293 292 291 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 461 Mixed 452 SusWrite 359 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 35.9 135% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 128%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 720GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 104 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 113 Write 101 Mixed 60 SusWrite 104 69% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 498GB free Firmware: JP4ONA00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 105 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.5% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 21.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	123x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16