Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 17:48
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 111 52% 82.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 284 30% 238 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB CLim: 1416 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 54 32% 42.8 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 31.2 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 99 108 110 89 91 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.7% Above average	Read 263 Write 139 Mixed 179 SusWrite 101 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 32 120% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 40.2 40% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 75%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 0GB free Firmware: 58.01D58 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 82 Write 48.4 Mixed 52.5 46% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 405GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 100 110 111 94 92 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 177 Write 179 Mixed 110 SusWrite 103 105% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 249% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 11 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	32x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	32x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	15x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	8x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	44x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $446

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16