HP Laptop 15-gw0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 49%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-gw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D1
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 102
53% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 315
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 502
34% 502 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 87D1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.24
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 17.6
0% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 12.2
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8480G 480GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 371 429 438 442 446 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 170
Write 23.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 360
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 7.7
52% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 14.5
12% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Laptop 15-gw0xxx Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 52%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-gw0xxx

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback