PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131122 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
65.3%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
41% 314 Pts
|
23% 340 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
15% 19.2 fps
|
16% 18 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 231 257 273 204 186 MB/s
|
88.9%
Excellent
|
80% 358 MB/s
|
146% 53.7 MB/s
|
158% 233 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$38
247GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 101 100 100 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
69% 94 MB/s
|
168% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44%
Average
|
44% 15.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
52% 76.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 66%, 297,441 samples | 2,013x |
FX-8320AMD $163Bench 63%, 98,447 samples | 567x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 61%, 188,098 samples | 360x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 642,081 samples | 307x |
RX 580AMD $218Bench 55%, 649,191 samples | 265x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples | 226x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $740 |