Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE B85M VH PLUS
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$325
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 108
2-Core 198
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 376
52% 378 Pts
64-Core 387
26% 387 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 1977 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 50
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 45.8
40% 49.2 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 40.5
37% 43 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$20
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150002
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 438
Write 304
Mixed 162
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 31.2
78% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 34.8
44% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 18.4
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 4,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback