Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 14:40
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$200 701,242 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 75 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 89% 161 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 834 84% 666 Pts	64-Core 1,096 74% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 60,035 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Asus(1043 059F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 124 Parallax 154 94% 131 fps	MRender 97.3 Gravity 112 Splatting 77.4 89% 95.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 768,156 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 292 295 288 289 292 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 450 Mixed 390 SusWrite 306 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 56 166% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38 2,182,040 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 404GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 141 142 142 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 147 Mixed 104 SusWrite 141 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 30.3 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 29.9 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 46,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 108%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $189

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $320Bench 87%, 471,942 samples	15,144x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $200Bench 84%, 701,242 samples	7,995x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $490Bench 88%, 205,696 samples	6,983x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 387,435 samples	7,302x
RX 5700-XTAMD $400Bench 108%, 292,752 samples	6,248x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $770Bench 138%, 160,541 samples	2,839x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $149Bench 326%, 192,610 samples	2,562x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 288%, 254,466 samples	2,496x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $138Bench 308%, 203,710 samples	2,467x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 85%, 403,833 samples	2,179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $214Bench 87%, 79,937 samples	2,013x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 85%, 182,067 samples	1,959x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16