Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 14:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 822
80% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,147
77% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$47
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 266 67 14 26 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.4% Poor
Read 136
Write 71
Mixed 82
SusWrite 110
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 10.4
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 13.1
10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung 650 120GB
75GB free
Firmware: FXT01B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 148 147 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 493
Write 420
Mixed 340
SusWrite 172
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 40
142% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 109
88% 127 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
495GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 116 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 72.3
Write 75.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 115
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $544
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback