Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 13:43
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 534 53% 432 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 206 Parallax 195 182% 208 fps	MRender 199 Gravity 153 Splatting 135 130% 162 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$135 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 364GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 222 218 222 221 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 346 Write 327 Mixed 317 SusWrite 221 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 28.7 92% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 212 157% 209 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 133%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 34GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 107 116 123 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 376 Write 275 Mixed 280 SusWrite 118 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 31.9 107% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 216 174% 247 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 95%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 55GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 231 232 234 233 233 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 387 Write 249 Mixed 247 SusWrite 220 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 31.7 115% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 206 168% 241 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 192 194 191 181 196 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 320 Write 240 Mixed 244 SusWrite 191 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 27 90% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 195 150% 203 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 95%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 143 Write 127 Mixed 112 SusWrite 134 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB 1,274 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 92 92 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 83.7 Write 76.1 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 89.4 49% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 120 121 122 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 118 Write 110 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 120 65% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C9 4x4GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	188x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16