Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 114
57% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 359
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 409
28% 409 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 56.5
36% 49.4 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 32.9
35% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$28
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 150 83 66 105 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.6% Above average
Read 254
Write 243
Mixed 217
SusWrite 103
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 26.6
98% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 153
123% 171 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$43
130GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 61.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 68.1
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra Trek 64GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 15 17 10 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 16.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 13
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
122% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 41GB
4266, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback