Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DA
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 62.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 435
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 454
30% 454 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B21) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.2
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 11
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 49 52 89 108 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42% Average
Read 68.2
Write 114
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 77.3
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DA_M409DA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback