Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 129
2-Core 252
91% 158 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 811
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 1016
68% 1016 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 117
Parallax 139
109% 130 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 108
111% 139 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$109
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 269 268 269 265 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2363
Write 1,317
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 294
285% 1,290 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 64.3
220% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 319
337% 573 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 212%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$210
740GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 436 436 445 441 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 345
Mixed 300
SusWrite 438
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 32.5
108% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 260
218% 316 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 117%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$59
219GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 192 189 175 211 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 341
Write 284
Mixed 280
SusWrite 193
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 34.5
125% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 88.6
107% 185 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
427GB free
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 516 465 453 452 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,161
Write 945
Mixed 969
SusWrite 476
199% 888 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 56.2
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 438
390% 601 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$80
893GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 214 212 214 214 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 140
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 213
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 120%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 30.9
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME Z390M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $814
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback