Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100420
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '21 at 10:20
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 143 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 369 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 328D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.8% Above average	Lighting 70.3 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 68.3 57% 71.1 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 68 56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 30.8 18% 26.3 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 25.1 23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 94 54 40 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 296 Write 133 Mixed 167 SusWrite 62 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 11.4 55% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 57.3 72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 59%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 431GB free Firmware: CCA4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 99.5 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 91.7 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 73%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 787GB free Firmware: CCA4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 108 107 106 107 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 110 Write 106 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 106 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 107 107 109 110 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 116 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 108 67% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 102 102 101 102 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 108 Write 61.5 Mixed 58 SusWrite 100 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$72 264 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 55GB free, PID 1697 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 106 138 114 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 144 Write 53 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 122 127% 100 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.2 65% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.9 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16