Lenovo 20ARS04D00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20ARS04D00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS04D00
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190523
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 09:11
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 106 105 74 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 404
Write 136
Mixed 128
SusWrite 95.7
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 20.4
105% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 69
101% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F 1321 SP008GLSTU160N02 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback