PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | HP 550-106nb (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 2B52 |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160929 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 02:27 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
43.1%
Average
|
48% 84.2 Pts
|
33% 241 Pts
|
16% 238 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.8%
Below average
|
30% 39.1 fps
|
32% 35.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 105 107 99 88 78 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
45% 205 MB/s
|
103% 37.8 MB/s
|
121% 178 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 150 169 169 169 168 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
103% 141 MB/s
|
213% 1.5 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
23%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
19% 6.5 GB/s
|
22% 184 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 117,483 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 724,497 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $210Bench 53%, 406,996 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |