PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140407 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 02:26 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
61.5%
Good
|
56% 88.8 Pts
|
34% 244 Pts
|
16% 238 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.1%
Very good
|
73% 86.4 fps
|
67% 85.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 153 115 80 74 63 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
68% 305 MB/s
|
167% 57.8 MB/s
|
154% 227 MB/s
|
![]() SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$219
312GB free
Firmware: X212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 362 392 372 375 376 MB/s
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
77% 344 MB/s
|
118% 42.2 MB/s
|
143% 223 MB/s
|
![]() SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
10GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.6 5.5 6.7 5.5 5.4 MB/s
|
6.01%
Terrible
|
13% 10.6 MB/s
|
87% 1.8 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
28.4%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
20% 6.83 GB/s
|
50% 79.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 66%, 275,971 samples | 1,980x |
FX-8320AMD $163Bench 63%, 98,447 samples | 565x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 61%, 229,679 samples | 358x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 50%, 648,344 samples | 303x |
RX 580AMD $218Bench 55%, 623,105 samples | 264x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,047,709 samples | 221x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $740 |