HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 days ago, 5 days ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 251
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 879
88% 696 Pts
64-Core 723
48% 723 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 108
Parallax 116
96% 114 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 109
Splatting 95.3
95% 124 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 118%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$313
757GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 2004 2030 2007 1515 1269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,220
Write 2,207
Mixed 1,727
SusWrite 1,762
445% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.8
226% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,097
825% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 316%
Great: 393%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$99
256GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 113 111 110 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 17
Write 1.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 110
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.8
370% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $550
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback