| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180418 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '21 at 21:27 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
80% 142 Pts
|
59% 443 Pts
|
26% 417 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
29% 37.8 fps
|
26% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 134 128 130 206 136 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
28% 124 MB/s
|
46% 15.2 MB/s
|
107% 142 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
884GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 186 185 186 185 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
118% 162 MB/s
|
148% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.4%
Below average
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
54% 74.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H310M-A Builds (Compare 804 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 213x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 138x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 121x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 108x |
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 72x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $218 |