Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime13.7 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-2310M-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 96.8
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 140
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 142
10% 142 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 120 75 73 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 397
Write 317
Mixed 326
SusWrite 121
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 15.1
81% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 31.3
76% 156 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i3-10100F $130Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback