MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190123
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 170 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 571 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 912 56% 912 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.6% Average	Lighting 55.8 Reflection 76.8 Parallax 52.8 46% 61.8 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 54 49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53 30,265 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 656 Write 660 Mixed 612 144% 643 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 30.3 100% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 473 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 369 286% 395 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 486 Write 446 Mixed 374 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 46.1 152% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 365 276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 718GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 205 202 203 206 207 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 153 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 204 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 27.8 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 19.6 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,175x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	748x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	643x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	323x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	282x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	225x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	204x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	167x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $702

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16