Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 32.1 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 44.7 23% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 70.1 9% 66.2 Pts	64-Core 51.4 3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2051 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 116 Parallax 103 84% 107 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 107 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 692GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 71 71 71 67 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.4% Very poor	Read 115 Write 103 Mixed 107 SusWrite 67.4 22% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 6.2 18% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 926GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 73 73 73 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 26.3 Write 61.6 Mixed 50 SusWrite 70 39% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16