MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 23:08
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 798
74% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Zotac(19DA 3612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 220
Parallax 261
206% 245 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 223
Splatting 162
174% 221 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 177%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
186GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 355
Write 316
Mixed 217
SusWrite 111
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 43.5
155% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 189
146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78%
Great: 111%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
131GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 99 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 246
Write 94
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 98.9
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.2
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 150
76% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
782GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 296 298 302 298 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 473
Mixed 425
SusWrite 295
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.1
200% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
SABRENT 1TB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 965 989 986 986 995 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
733GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 97 101 100 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 68.3
Write 91.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 97.3
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
781GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 168 169 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 162
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 167
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 24.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $703
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback