Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 173
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 468
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.2% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 67
Parallax 57.9
42% 59 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 54.4
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 293 335 71 28 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 372
Write 310
Mixed 284
SusWrite 172
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$24
814GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 159 147 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 164
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
14GB free, PID a20c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 19.5
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
44GB free, PID a20c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 19.6
33% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-174. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MP-S/-V/H67MP Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback