PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-A (all builds) |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140508 |
Uptime | 7.9 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '21 at 15:25 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-4690K-$175
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
61.2%
Good
|
66% 113 Pts
|
39% 284 Pts
|
20% 292 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2060-$338
Asus(1043 868B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.4%
Above average
|
44% 74.1 fps
|
67% 61.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 79 29 27 29 33 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
55% 247 MB/s
|
84% 29.3 MB/s
|
201% 298 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$49
106GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 278 264 288 287 273 MB/s
|
97.3%
Outstanding
|
81% 359 MB/s
|
157% 54.7 MB/s
|
261% 350 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
44% 92 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 83%, 391,364 samples | 3,112x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $175Bench 80%, 188,918 samples | 1,819x |
Core i7-4790Intel $225Bench 77%, 214,926 samples | 491x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 656,857 samples | 1,256x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $330Bench 80%, 1,087,008 samples | 458x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,090,662 samples | 374x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $938 |