Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 07:14
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 619
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 202
Parallax 237
178% 219 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 222
Splatting 165
171% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 168 186 239 259 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 360
Write 338
Mixed 330
SusWrite 208
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 36.1
120% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 210
152% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
134GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 362 415 333 317 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 448
Mixed 434
SusWrite 339
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 43.1
157% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
385GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 297 339 336 336 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 347
Write 336
Mixed 330
SusWrite 315
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 38.8
128% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 232
174% 232 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 133%
Kingdian S280 480GB
129GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 164 181 112 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 353
Write 318
Mixed 310
SusWrite 126
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 29.2
100% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 94.2
99% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
98GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Read 51.8
Write 27.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 94
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G Kllisre DDR3 8G 89C2 KRE-D3U1600M/8G Kllisre DDR3 8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback