Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 22:45
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 941
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,461
98% 1,461 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 159
Parallax 159
129% 159 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
119% 151 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$118
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 1074 1100 1066 1064 1071 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,938
Write 3,215
Mixed 2,959
SusWrite 1,004
568% 2,529 MB/s
4K Read 79
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 108
352% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,116
848% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 340%
Great: 416%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1706 1710 1723 1708 1718 1574 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,717
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1,690
336% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 81.3
277% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 924
698% 916 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 285%
Great: 297%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
233GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 407 293 293 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 451
Mixed 447
SusWrite 365
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 59.8
197% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 439 446 447 443 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 448
Mixed 382
SusWrite 446
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 49.2
168% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 183 184 183 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 179
Mixed 77
SusWrite 179
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.4
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 38.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 56,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback