Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 83.8 47% 69.5 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 209 21% 170 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 05AA) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 20.8 13% 18.9 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 16.3 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 169GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 223 245 231 230 229 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 343 Write 338 Mixed 266 SusWrite 241 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 31.3 106% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 92.6 DQ Mixed 49.9 42% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16